Transaction Details

API

Overview Execution Plan Enhanced Plan Tree Plan Receipts Summary

Receipt:

8akJyBdhBHJfwPB4DJg8CYEXrq1UBams4KVFfPbLUKTw

Status:

Success

Block:

204,154,640

Timestamp:

From:

haenko.near(ed25519:DDonr6boUsVbanBzZjkSnPBo2FRj6QDq5rbzshpSCB8Z)

To:

vote.degenhostest.near

Value:

0.23864 Ⓝ($0.46)

Burnt Gas:

2.754 Tgas

Burnt Tokens:

0.000275 Ⓝ

Actions:

Called method create_proposal in contract vote.degenhostest.near

{

"flow": "Classic",

"actions": null,

"metadata": {

"link": "https://gov.near.org/t/hsp-xxx-evgeny-test-2/42229",

"title": "Evgeny test 2",

"description": "Frontmatter\\nhsp: 142\\ntitle: Improve Community Governance Transparency\\ndescription: Establish a transparent governance reporting framework for stakeholders and contributors.\\nauthor: John Doe <[email protected]>\\ndiscussions-to: https://forum.example.org/t/governance-transparency\\nstatus: Draft\\ntrack: Decision\\ntype: Simple Majority\\ncategory: Governance\\nstakeholders: Governance Council, Community Members, Contributors\\ncreated: 2026-06-19\\nAbstract\\nTESTING\\nThis proposal introduces a standardized governance transparency framework designed to improve visibility into decision-making processes, resource allocation, and community participation. The initiative seeks to establish consistent reporting practices, publicly accessible documentation, and accountability mechanisms for governance activities. Increased transparency is expected to strengthen trust among stakeholders, improve participation rates, and support more informed decision-making throughout the ecosystem. By creating clear standards and expectations, the proposal aims to reduce information asymmetry while fostering a more collaborative and sustainable governance environment.\\n\\nPayload\\nGovernance Transparency Framework\\nContext\\nTESTING\\nTESTING\\nTESTING\\n1111\\nAs decentralized ecosystems continue to grow, governance processes become increasingly complex and involve a larger number of stakeholders. Previous discussions have highlighted concerns regarding limited visibility into governance decisions, unclear communication channels, and inconsistent reporting practices across working groups. Community members have repeatedly expressed the need for improved transparency to better understand how decisions are made and how resources are allocated.\\n\\nSeveral governance initiatives introduced reporting mechanisms, but implementation standards have varied significantly between groups. This inconsistency has resulted in fragmented information, making it difficult for stakeholders to evaluate governance effectiveness or participate meaningfully in decision-making processes.\\n\\nThe ecosystem is currently entering a period of increased activity, with multiple strategic initiatives requiring broad stakeholder alignment. Establishing a transparent governance framework at this stage can help support sustainable growth while improving confidence in governance structures.\\n\\nProblem\\nGovernance information is often distributed across multiple platforms, documents, and communication channels. Stakeholders may struggle to locate relevant information, understand decision rationales, or track the status of governance initiatives. This lack of visibility can reduce participation, create misunderstandings, and weaken trust in governance processes.\\n\\nWithout standardized transparency requirements, governance bodies may unintentionally operate with varying levels of accountability. As the ecosystem grows, these inconsistencies become increasingly difficult to manage and may negatively impact stakeholder engagement.\\n\\nApproach\\nThe proposal establishes a unified transparency framework that standardizes reporting, documentation, and communication practices across governance activities. Rather than introducing additional governance layers or approval requirements, the framework focuses on improving information accessibility and consistency.\\n\\nAlternative approaches could include creating entirely new governance structures or implementing mandatory oversight committees. While these options may increase control mechanisms, they could also introduce additional complexity and administrative burden. The proposed framework achieves improved transparency with minimal disruption to existing governance operations while remaining adaptable to future needs.\\n\\nBenefits include improved stakeholder awareness, stronger accountability, and easier access to governance information. Limitations include the ongoing effort required to maintain reporting standards and ensure timely publication of information.\\n\\nEnd-to-end Value Hypothesis\\nThe proposal creates value by improving access to governance information, increasing accountability, and strengthening stakeholder confidence in governance processes. By standardizing transparency practices, participants can more effectively engage in discussions, evaluate decisions, and contribute to ecosystem development.\\n\\nObjective\\nEstablish a standardized governance transparency framework that ensures governance activities, decisions, and reporting are consistently documented and accessible to stakeholders.\\n\\nOutcome\\nStakeholders gain reliable access to governance information, resulting in greater understanding of decision-making processes, improved participation, and increased trust in governance institutions.\\n\\nDependencies\\nPublic documentation platform capable of hosting governance records.\\nExisting governance bodies willing to publish standardized reports.\\nCommunication channels accessible to all stakeholders.\\nArchival infrastructure for long-term storage of governance documentation.\\nEvidence of existence includes currently operational governance forums, documentation repositories, and community communication platforms already used within the ecosystem.\\n\\nKey Performance Indicators (KPIs)\\nMonthly publication rate of governance reports.\\nPercentage of governance meetings documented publicly.\\nStakeholder engagement measured through comments and feedback submissions.\\nAccessibility metrics for governance documentation.\\nCommunity satisfaction surveys regarding governance transparency.\\nTechnical Specification\\nThe framework requires the creation of a structured reporting template, governance document repository, and standardized publication schedule. Documentation shall be stored in publicly accessible repositories with version control support. Governance records shall include meeting minutes, voting results, attendance records, and implementation updates. Search functionality and categorization standards shall be applied to improve discoverability.\\n\\nBackwards Compatibility\\nThe proposal does not conflict with existing governance rules or technical systems. Current governance processes may continue operating without modification while adopting standardized transparency practices. Existing documentation repositories remain compatible with the proposed framework.\\n\\nSecurity Considerations\\nPotential risks include publication of inaccurate information, delayed reporting, and unauthorized modification of governance records.\\n\\nMitigation measures include:\\n\\nVersion-controlled documentation repositories.\\nPublic auditability of published reports.\\nDefined reporting responsibilities.\\nBackup and archival procedures.\\nStakeholders\\nActivity / Decision\\tResponsible\\tAccountable\\tConsulted\\tInformed\\nFramework Design\\tGovernance Working Group\\tGovernance Council\\tCommunity Members\\tAll Stakeholders\\nReport Publication\\tGovernance Secretary\\tGovernance Council\\tWorking Groups\\tCommunity\\nDocumentation Review\\tReview Committee\\tGovernance Council\\tContributors\\tStakeholders\\nKPI Monitoring\\tOperations Team\\tGovernance Council\\tAnalysts\\tCommunity\\nImplementation Plan\\nDefinition of Done:\\n\\nGovernance transparency standards documented and approved.\\nReporting templates published.\\nDocumentation repository established.\\nMonthly reporting process activated.\\nPublic access verified.\\nKPI monitoring procedures implemented.\\nStakeholder feedback process established.\\nInitial transparency report published.\\nProgress updates shall be published monthly through official governance communication channels.\\n\\nMilestones\\nMilestone name\\tTarget date\\tDeliverable\\tSuccess criteria\\nFramework Approval\\t2026-07-15\\tApproved framework document\\tGovernance approval received\\nRepository Launch\\t2026-08-01\\tPublic documentation portal\\tPublic access verified\\nReporting Rollout\\t2026-09-01\\tFirst monthly report\\tReport published successfully\\nKPI Review\\t2026-12-01\\tKPI assessment report\\tMetrics collected and reviewed\\nBudget & Resources\\nEstimated budget: $25,000\\n\\nAllocation:\\n\\nDocumentation infrastructure: $8,000\\nReporting and administration: $10,000\\nCommunity engagement activities: $4,000\\nMonitoring and evaluation: $3,000\\nFunds shall be distributed based on milestone completion and verification.\\n\\nConflict of Interest\\nThe author confirms that they have read and agree with the House of Stake Conflict of Interest policy. At the time of submission, no material conflicts of interest have been identified.\\n\\nCopyright\\nCopyright and related rights waived via CC0 1.0.",

"voting_options": [

"For",

"Against",

"Abstain"

]

}

Result:

173

Logs:

{  "standard": "venear",  "version": "1.0.0",  "event": "create_proposal",  "data": [    {      "proposer_id": "haenko.near",      "proposal_id": 173    }  ]}

Receipt:

8vYqBQS9e3Hk5Ar4vBrrJfdes39ZTStjnYZg9LYGk5tL

Status:

Success

Block:

204,154,641

Timestamp:

From:

vote.degenhostest.near(ed25519:DDonr6boUsVbanBzZjkSnPBo2FRj6QDq5rbzshpSCB8Z)

To:

haenko.near

Value:

0.04964 Ⓝ($0.10)

Burnt Gas:

0.223 Tgas

Burnt Tokens:

0.000022 Ⓝ

Actions:

Transfer 0.04964

{

"deposit": "49640000000000000000000"

}

Result:

Empty Result

Logs:

No Logs

Receipt:

HTzrDsgGBnhFNZn1LTbJGUWwX1zddc5xrZX8DfB5hdXR

Status:

Success

Block:

204,154,641

Timestamp:

From:

system

To:

haenko.near

Value:

0.009793 Ⓝ($0.02)

Burnt Gas:

0.223 Tgas

Burnt Tokens:

0 Ⓝ

Actions:

Transfer 0.009793

{

"deposit": "9793083874379000000000"

}

Result:

Empty Result

Logs:

No Logs